Why Do Conservatives Hate NPR?
Thursday, May 12th, 2011Since the House of Representatives began talk of defunding public broadcasting, and right-wing pundits started accusing NPR of a liberal bias, I have been paying closer attention to what gets broadcast on the public airwaves. Until recently I have been mystified by these accusations. Unlike commercial broadcast outlets like Fox and MSNBC which might bill themselves respectively as semi-official organs of the Republican and Democratic parties, PBS and NPR work to avoid partisanship or bias at all cost. Full disclosure – PBS, and number of local station affiliates, are clients of my firm, which has made me even more interested in this controversy.
As I was listening to NPR today, however, it hit me what conservatives may find too “liberal” about public broadcasting. I think it comes down to what might be termed “a slavish deference to the facts.”
For example, on NPR’s popular Science Friday show evolution is treated as a solid scientific basis for discussion, not a theory that should be debated on an equal footing with a religious theory: creationism. Ira Flatow regularly talks with scientists about discoveries that assume the earth is more than 6,000 years old. Doing so, he doesn’t question the assumption that the universe is billions of years old. To scientists this makes perfect sense, but to ideologues who would mix a religious theory with a scientific one, it is a clear sign of bias.
Another thing that must rankle conservatives is NPR and PBS treating controversial issues as just that: controversial. Abortion battles, the struggle for gay rights, immigration reform, and similar hot-button issues are all covered fairly with each side given almost a second-by-second parity. Conservatives accustomed to a sneer at liberal positions on these and other issues from their reliable Fox anchors can be forgiven for mistaking neutrality for a liberal bias.
Political discourse in this country has become so polarized that anyone airing the opposing side’s view of an issue is assumed to agree with that side. All this says to me is that we need more debate, more objectivity, and a greater reliance on the facts, not less. We need public broadcasting.




