An interesting article in the New York Time today describes various cities’ efforts to get money out of their nonprofits.

It strikes me that when municipal governments start looking to local nonprofits for help with public sector financial problems the end of civilization cannot be far off. What’s next, the mayor standing in line at the soup kitchen?

This phenomenon reminds me of a story I heard from a client who worked for a tech company. He claimed he could track his company’s fortunes by the prices at the soda vending machine in the lunchroom. When he first started at the company the vending machine was left open and the sodas were free. As the economy tightened a modest charge was imposed at the vending machine, basically to cover the cost of the drinks. “But,” he told me, “when they raised the prices again and I figured out that the vending machine was now being viewed as a profit center, I knew the company was in trouble.”

Viewing nonprofits as a revenue source for local government strikes me as the “vending machine as profit center” way of thinking.  The entire tax system is off, yet we look to nonprofits rather than to tax reform. The U.S. has the highest corporate tax rate in the world – yet many large companies pay nothing at all. Let’s look to close those loopholes before we start asking the local community hospital to contribute to the city’s coffers.

2010 has seen somewhat of an easing of the Great Recession, at least on Wall Street. But things are not yet looking up for the nation’s nonprofits. And 2011 is going to be especially dicey. Here are 5 reasons why:

1.    Home foreclosures are still going gangbusters. Until this trend eases there will be no incentive to buy a house that is not in distress and with 10 houses on the market for every buyer prices will continue to drop. States where the housing market is an important part of the economy, and the tax base, will continue to suffer.

2.    Employment is stagnant and what new jobs we are seeing are largely temporary, with no benefits or security. The continuation of the perfect poverty storm – more people needing more services just when there are fewer tax and donor dollars to pay for them – is assured for the next year.

3.    The federal government just passed the largest package of tax breaks in recent history yet is “firmly committed” to deficit reduction. How does that work? By cutting discretionary spending. Since they can’t cut Social Security and Medicare, and they won’t cut the military, that leaves relatively small pockets of social program spending – pockets which nonprofits depend upon – to take deep cuts.

4.    The states are in real trouble. Many are nearing insolvency. Unlike the feds they can’t just print more money, and most have a constitutional requirement for a balanced budget. The quickest way to electoral defeat is to mention the possibility of raising taxes, and states too have entitlements that must be met. That means those few dollars spent on discretionary social programs are going to be squeezed even more tightly, and  even required programs like health care for the poor are going to be pared down to the bone. In California, where counties deliver the bulk of human services, we have already seen health and social services authorities both “lengthen the line and thin the soup.”  The pot will soon be empty.

5.    No one cares. In times of economic difficulty it is normal for people to look to their own needs first. And with jobs dicey, homes under water, and the general gloomy economic environment, “compassion fatigue” is in full swing.

Lest I leave you with no hope – let’s remember that this whole period of deep misery is temporary. The economy will improve, employers will begin adding jobs again, and we’ll return to the normal moderate level of misery. We just need to keep being smart, doing what we can, and finding creative solutions – to get us through 2011.